Review article |
![]() |
![]() |
Stamatia Destounis Department of Breast Imaging, Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC., 170 Sawgrass Dr, Rochester, NY, 14617, United StatesE-mail: sdestounis@ewbc.com |
Stamatia Destounis
Department of Breast Imaging, Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC., 170 Sawgrass Dr, Rochester, NY, 14617, United States1. |
Mayo RC, Parikh JR. Breast imaging: The face of imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:1003-7.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
2. |
Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-7.
PubMed Google Scholar |
3. |
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-75.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
4. |
Pisano ED, Gastonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
5. |
Guterbock TM, Cohn WF, Rexrode DL, Eggleston CM, Dean-McKinney M, Novicoff WM, et al. What do women know about breast density? Results from a population survey of virginia women. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:34-44.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
6. |
Gunn CM, Battaglia TA, Paasche-Orlow MK, West AK, Kressin NR. Women’s perceptions of dense breast notifications in a Massachusetts safety net hospital: So what is that supposed to mean? Patient Educ Couns 2018;101:1123-9.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
7. |
Kressin NR, Gunn CM, Battaglia TA. Content, readability, and understandability of dense breast notifications by state. JAMA 2016;315:1786-8.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
8. |
Gunn CM, Kressin NR, Cooper K, Marturano C, Freund KM, Battaglia TA, et al. Primary care provider experience with breast density legislation in Massachusetts. J Womens Health 2018;27:615-22.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
9. |
Maimone S, McDonough MD, Hines SL. Breast density reporting laws and supplemental screening-a survey of referring providers’ experiences and understanding. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017;46:105-9.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
10. |
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-63.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
11. |
Weigert J, Steenergen S. The connecticut experiment: The role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J 2012;18:517-22.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
12. |
Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE, et al. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with connecticut public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265:59-69.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
13. |
Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R. Initial experience with the New York State breast density inform law at a community-based breast center. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:993-1000.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
14. |
Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T, Kawai M, Yamamoto S, Zheng YF, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan strategic anti-cancer randomized trial (J-START): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387:341-8.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
15. |
Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R. New York State breast density mandate: Follow˗up data with screening sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2017;36:2511-7.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
16. |
Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, et al. benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:157-66.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
17. |
Sanders LM, King AB, Goodman KS. Impact of the new jersey breast density law on imaging and intervention volumes and breast cancer diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:1189-94.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
18. |
Horný M, Cohen Duszak R Jr., Christiansen CL, Shwartz M, Burgess JF Jr. Dense breast notification laws: Impact on downstream imaging after screening mammography. Med Care Res Rev 2018.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
19. |
Sobotka J, Hinrichs C. Breast density legislation: Discussion of patient utilization and subsequent direct financial ramifications for insurance providers. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:1011-5.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
20. |
Aripoli A, Fountain K, Winblad O, Gatewood J, Hill J, Wick JA, et al. Supplemental screening with automated breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts: Comparing notification methods and screening behaviors. Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:W22-8.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
21. |
Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1554-63.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
22. |
Giger ML, Inciardi MF, Edwards A, Papaioannou J, Drukker K, Jiang Y, et al. Automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of women with dense breasts: Reader study of mammography-negative and mammography-positive cancers. Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:1341-50.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
23. |
Vourtsis A, Kachulis A. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 2018;28:592-601.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
24. |
ACR Statement on Reporting Breast Density in Mammography Reports and Patient Summaries 2017.
Google Scholar |
25. |
NCCN Guidelines for Detection, Prevention, and Risk Reduction. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Version 2.2018. 2018.
Google Scholar |
26. |
Siu AL, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:279-96.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
27. |
Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Hammond CS, Hanna LG, Grove MR, Brown M, et al. Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:954-61.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
28. |
Hardesty LA, Lind KE, Gutierrez EJ. Compliance with screening mammography guidelines after a false-positive mammogram. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:1032-8.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar |
29. |
Health Quality Ontario. Women’s experiences of inaccurate breast cancer screening results: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2016;16:1-22.
PubMed Google Scholar |
Destounis S, Arieno A, Santacroce A. Screening Ultrasound for Women with Dense Breasts in the Age of Patient-Centered Care. Am J Sonogr 2018; 1(14).1-6.