Sonographic Appearance of Testicular Hemangioma: A Case Report
Most palpable testicular masses are malignant, with well described sonographic findings in the literature compared to more rare, benign testicular masses. Because benign palpable masses in the testes are rare entities, work-up often results in radical orchidectomy in favor of a more conservative approach. We present a case of a testicular hemangioma in a 38-year-old male patient. Sonographic imaging of a testicular hemangioma typically shows an hyperechoic lesion, often with internal vascularity on Doppler, which can help to differentiate this benign lesion from a malignant mass.
A 38-year-old male patient presented to an outpatient urology clinic with a firm mass noted in the right testicle. He denied pain, fever, chills, and dysuria. Serum tumor marker evaluation revealed an alpha-fetoprotein, lactate dehydrogenase, and ß-human chorionic gonadotropin within normal range. Ultrasound (US) of the right testicle demonstrated an intratesticular heterogeneous mass [Figure 1]. Color Doppler demonstrated internal vascularity within the lesion [Figure 2]. Given suspicion for malignant testicular tumors, a radical orchiectomy was performed.
Grossly, a well-circumscribed nodule with bulging and hemorrhagic cut surfaces was identified within the lower pole of the testis measuring 1.4 cm×1.3 cm×0.9 cm in size. The nodule was located 0.2 cm from the tunica albuginea and it did not involve the tunica vaginalis or epididymis. The remaining testicular parenchyma was normal appearing. Microscopic pathological evaluation of the right testicle demonstrated a well-defined mass composed of closely-packed capillaries with extensive hemorrhage consistent with a benign capillary hemangioma. The background testicular parenchyma was normal. There was no evidence of germ cell tumor (GCT) or germ cell neoplasia in situ given negative staining for OCT3/4. The lesional cells were positive for cluster of differentiation 31, while negative for Sall-4 and D2-40. These pathology findings are presented in Figure 3.
Intratesticular hemangiomas are a rare entity with a handful of cases described in the literature, primarily in the pediatric population. The majority of the described intratesticular hemangioma cases have been in patients below the age of 19 years. There are four histological subtypes described in the pathologic literature: cavernous, capillary, epithelioid/ histiocytoid, and papillary endothelial. The most common among these are capillary hemangioma.[2,3]
Testicular hemangiomas typically present as a painless intratesticular masses, rarely with bleeding or ulceration. Serum tumor markers are often normal. Given the high incidence of malignant testicular tumors, these lesions often lead to an extensive metastatic workup of the patient. Recognition of benign testicular tumors, while rare, is essential in avoiding unnecessary patient anxiety, diagnostic workup, and unindicated orchiectomy.[2,5]
Our 38-year-old patient presented with a painless testicular mass, with arterial flow noted within a hyperechoic lesion on Doppler US [Figure 2]. Differential for a hyperechoic intratesticular mass includes lipoma, epidermoid cyst, testicular hemangioma, seminoma, sex cord-stromal tumors, and primary GCTs. High-frequency ultrasonography, often with color and power Doppler, has a central role in differentiating these entities given that it is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the scrotum.[6,7]
On US, testicular hemangiomas typically appear as heterogeneously hyperechoic masses, usually without internal flow on Doppler imaging. When hemangiomas demonstrate flow on Doppler imaging, these can be difficult to distinguish from malignant tumors. However, vascularity in hemangiomas is not tumoral. Furthermore, it is important to remember that hemangiomas are comprised of capillaries, which are usually too small to detect on Doppler US. In some cases, hemangiomas can develop arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), making them visible on color and spectral Doppler imaging [Figure 2b]. This explains the findings in our case.
On the contrary, epidermoid cysts classically present with an onion ring appearance on US and lack internal flow on Doppler imaging. Seminomas typically present as hypoechoic, well-circumscribed masses with marked internal flow. Lipomas appear as hyperechoic, well-circumscribed masses without internal flow. Sex cord-stromal tumors are derived from Sertoli and Leydig cells. On US, they are typically discovered incidentally as well-circumscribed homogeneous hypoechoic lesions with internal vascularity. Primary GCTs arise from spermatogenic cells and are divided into seminomatous and nonseminomatous types. On US, GCTs typically appear as heterogeneous masses, some with internal calcifications and cystic components. Increased vascularity may or may not be seen, making them a diagnostic challenge.
While our patient did not undergo further imaging evaluation, there is growing evidence for use of contrast- enhancing US (CEUS) as well as strain elastography to further differentiate testicular hemangiomas from other testicular masses. CEUS findings of testicular hemangiomas include a unique peripheral nodular pattern of enhancement on arterial phase with slow clearance in venous phase.[12,13] This is consistent with CEUS findings of hemangiomas in other organs. Strain elastography of testicular hemangiomas typically demonstrates a soft lesion, which is more suggestive of a benign testicular lesion. The use of additional US imaging tools can help to further differentiate benign lesions from malignant masses.
While rare, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with the sonographic appearance of testicular hemangiomas, particularly when they demonstrate internal vascularity to avoid unindicated orchiectomies and diagnostic workup. Capillary flow can be difficult to visualize on Doppler US, which leads to most capillary hemangiomas appearing avascular. However, as we have described above, capillary hemangiomas can develop internal AVFs, leading to a vascular appearance on Doppler imaging.
Declaration of patient consentThe authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.
Financial support and sponsorshipNil.
Conflicts of interestThere are no conflicts of interest.
- Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011;17:52-63Imaging of non-neoplastic intratesticular masses.
- [Google Scholar]
- Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2008;19:614-8Diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the penis, scrotum, perineum, and rectum a rare tumor.
- [Google Scholar]
- Rev Urol. 2014;16:198-201Intratesticular epidermoid cyst masquerading as testicular torsion.
- [Google Scholar]